Loading

E-mail Templates

The message itself — merge fields, the design it wraps in, attachments and invites, and testing before anybody receives it.

E-mail Templates

A template is one message: its subject, its body, and whatever it merges in.

Where to find it

Architect Panel → Layout & Pages:

  • E-mail Templates — the templates
  • E-mail Designs — the wrapper they use

Architect Panel → Integration & Connections:

  • E-mail Accounts — the accounts mail is sent and received through

What a template holds

  • A name and a subject.
  • The body, with merge fields.
  • A design to wrap it.
  • Attachments.
  • A tracking switch.
  • Optionally a calendar invitation.

Content, not layout

The discipline that makes templates maintainable. Header, footer and styling belong to the design; a template carrying its own has opted out and will not follow the next rebrand.

When you find yourself adding layout, the design is missing something — fix it there.

Templates can be built with the page builder

Where a message needs more than plain content — a structured layout, a richer arrangement — a template can be a page builder document rather than hand-written markup. That suits marketing-style messages and keeps the authoring visual.

For ordinary transactional mail, simple content in a good design is usually better and far more robust across mail clients.

Open tracking is per template

A switch on each template rather than a global setting, which is the right granularity — tracking a marketing message is a different proposition from tracking a password reset.

What it records is worth knowing: not merely that a message was opened, but the identity of who opened it, with the time, address and browser. That is personal data about a named individual, not anonymous statistics.

So switch it on deliberately

Leave it off for transactional mail, where it adds nothing you will act on and collects behavioural data about people receiving something they asked for. Turn it on where you will genuinely use the result — and cover it in your privacy information.

Open tracking is also unreliable, since many clients block or pre-load images. Treat it as directional at best.

Subjects do most of the work

A subject is what decides whether a message is opened. Be specific and factual — "Your appointment on 14 March" rather than "Important information" — and keep it short enough to survive truncation on a phone.

Name templates so they can be found

You will accumulate dozens. "Appointment reminder — 24 hours" is findable; "Email 7" is not, and somebody will eventually edit the wrong one.

Review them occasionally

Templates outlive the processes that send them. A periodic look for ones nothing sends any more, and ones whose wording has drifted out of date, keeps the set honest.

Worked example

An organisation runs about forty templates, all using one design and holding only content. Tracking is on for two campaign templates and off for everything transactional. Names describe the message and its trigger, so the annual review found six templates nothing had sent in a year.

Recommendations

  • Keep templates to content.
  • Leave tracking off for transactional mail.
  • Write specific subjects, short enough for a phone.
  • Name them for the message and its trigger.

Merge Fields

Merge fields put values from the record into the message, so one template serves every recipient.

Where to find it

Architect Panel → Layout & Pages:

  • E-mail Templates — where fields are inserted

Architect Panel → Data:

  • Datastores — the fields being merged

Architect Panel → Activity:

  • E-mail Log — every message sent, with its result

What can be merged

Values from the record the message concerns, and context about the send. The available set depends on what is sending — a template used by one process may have fields another does not.

Empty fields are the main hazard

The failure everybody has received: "Dear ," or "Your appointment on is confirmed."

It looks careless, it undermines the message, and it happens whenever a field is optional and somebody left it blank. Merge fields do not fail loudly — they simply produce nothing.

Design for the blank case

Two approaches, and both are better than hoping:

  • Make the field required where the message genuinely depends on it.
  • Write around it — "Hello" rather than "Dear [first name]" — so a blank is invisible.

The second is usually the more robust, because required fields get worked around and imported data arrives incomplete.

Check the field is the one you meant

Similar names are easy to confuse — the contact's name and the account's, the site address and the billing address. The mistake is invisible until somebody receives a message addressed to their company's parent, and the log will show it went out that way to everybody.

Formatting

A date merged raw may not read as you would write it. Where a value has a natural presentation — a date, an amount, a reference — check how it appears in a real message rather than assuming.

Do not merge what should not be there

A merge field is a way to put data into an outgoing message, which means it is a way to disclose it. Think about whether each value should be in an e-mail at all — mail is not confidential, is forwarded, and sits in mailboxes indefinitely.

Reference numbers are usually better than the details behind them: "regarding case TKT-00042" rather than the case's contents.

Test with real records

Including an awkward one — the record with a blank optional field, an unusually long name, an apostrophe, an accented character. A template tested only against a tidy example will meet all of those in its first day.

Check the log after a template change

The log holds what was actually sent, so it is where a merge problem is visible. Reading a few real sends after changing a template catches an error before hundreds go out.

Worked example

A reminder template was tested against a record with every field populated and went out to 400 people, forty of whom had no title recorded and received "Dear ,". The template now opens with "Hello" and no merged salutation, and template changes are checked against a deliberately sparse test record.

Recommendations

  • Write around optional fields rather than requiring them.
  • Verify you have the field you meant.
  • Prefer a reference to the details behind it.
  • Test with a sparse record, not a tidy one.

Testing Before You Send

Testing e-mail properly takes a few minutes and prevents the class of problem that is impossible to take back.

Where to find it

Architect Panel → Layout & Pages:

  • E-mail Templates — the template under test

Architect Panel → Activity:

  • E-mail Log — every message sent, with its result

Architect Panel → Commercial:

  • Campaign Manager — where a bulk send is paused if it goes wrong

A preview is not a test

It shows the template rendering in your browser. It does not exercise the design, the account, the merge fields against a real record, or any mail client's interpretation.

Nearly every e-mail problem worth catching is invisible in a preview.

Send a real one

Through the actual account, using a real record, to a real mailbox. That single step catches the design not applying, the from name being wrong, merge fields empty, and the message landing in spam.

Check it on a phone

Most mail is read on one. A layout that works on a laptop and breaks on a handset is the common case, not the exception — and the subject line truncates far earlier than you expect.

Check more than one client

At minimum a desktop client, a webmail service and a phone. Mail clients differ enormously, and a message that looks right in one can be unreadable in another.

Test the awkward record

Blank optional fields, a long name, an apostrophe, an accent. A template tested only against tidy data will meet all of those immediately.

Check where it landed

Not just that it arrived — whether it reached the inbox or the spam folder. A message the log records as sent successfully can be filed as junk, and that is invisible from your side.

Read it as the recipient

Does the from name identify you? Does the subject say what it is? Does the first line make sense without the subject? Is it obvious what to do next?

This is the check most likely to improve the message rather than merely confirm it works.

For a bulk send, go in stages

  1. Test to yourself.
  2. Send to a small internal group.
  3. Only then to the audience, throttled.

And know where the pause control is before you start. The moment you need it is not the moment to be looking for it.

Test again after any change

Including a change to the design, which affects every template at once. A design edit is a change to all of your outgoing mail and deserves testing as such.

Worked example

A team tests every template change by sending one real message to four mailboxes including two phones, using a deliberately sparse record. A campaign goes to three colleagues before its audience. The one time a link was wrong, it was found by the second colleague rather than by 4,000 customers.

Recommendations

  • Always send a real message — a preview proves nothing.
  • Check a phone and more than one client.
  • Use a sparse record for the test.
  • Stage bulk sends, and find the pause control first.